- Length: 1352 words (3.9 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
Affirmative Action in Higher Education
In its tumultuous forty year history, affirmative action has been both praised and attacked as an answer to racial inequality. The policy was introduced by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965 as a method of redressing discrimination that persisted despite civil right efforts and constitutional guarantees. After the passage of Title VII, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin, President Johnson shaped affirmative action through the passage of Executive Order 11246 in 1965. The executive order requires government contractors to "take affirmative action" toward prospective minority employees in all aspects of hiring and employment.
On college campuses nation wide, the debate over affirmative action policies started with the implementation of Title VII. Many viewed affirmative action programs as a tool that would not only expand the opportunities of minorities but also play a significant role in diversifying America’s colleges and universities. However, in the late 1970’s, despite its good intentions, flaws in the policy began to show up. Reverse discrimination became an issue, exemplified by the Regents of California vs. Bake case in 1978.
Allan Bakke, a white applicant, had been denied admission twice to the University of California Medical School at Davis, while less qualified minority students were being accepted. The medical school had separate admission policies for minority students and reserved and certain amount of spaces specifically for minorities. Bakke had felt that he had been discriminated against and maintained that his rejection violated the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment, so he took the University of California Regents to the Supreme Court of California. The Supreme Court ruled that while race was a legitimate factor in school admissions, the use of quotas as the medical school had set aside was not.
The most important affirmative action decisions since the Bakke decision were in the landmark 2003 cases involving University of Michigan’s affirmative action programs. Two cases, first tried in 2000 and 2001, were involved: Gratz v. Bollinger, which challenged the University of Michigan's undergraduate admission’s policy and Grutter v. Bollinger which challenged its law school admission’s policy. As Bakke had done before, both Gratz and Grutter challenged the constitutionality of the University’s admission policy, which they argued, was in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the fourteenth amendment. The Supreme Court upheld the University of Michigan Law School's policy, ruling that race can be one of many factors considered by colleges when selecting their students because it furthers "a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body.
How to Cite this Page
|Essay about Affirmative Action - Affirmative action caught in tale of the two cities of Boston, Massachusetts and Denver, Colorado. Since the late 1980s, race and sex-based contracting preference programs in the U.S. cities have faced significant challenges in the courts (Rubin). On February 7th, Boston Mayor Thomas Menino announced his plan to eliminate a 15 year old program that required bidders on city construction contracts to subcontract 15% of work to minority-owned business enterprises and 5% to women-owned firms (Rubin).... [tags: Affirmative Action]||870 words|
| Affirmative Action Essay - Affirmative action- a plan to offset past discrimination in employing or educating women, blacks etc. (Websters New World Dictionary.) The history of affirmative action has its roots in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and stems from the United States Supreme case of Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka Kansas. In 1965, President Linden B. Johnson issued Executive Order #11246 at Howard University that required federal contractors to undertake affirmative action to increase the number of minorities that they employ.... [tags: Affirmative Action Essays]|
:: 1 Works Cited
| Affirmative Action Essay - Though Affirmative Action is a current controversial issue, it is far from new; its decree has been long in the making. Perhaps it originates from amendments 13-15, the series of amendments that outlawed slavery, guaranteed equal protection under the law, and forbid racial discrimination when voting, respectively (Sykes 1). The Supreme Court’s decision in 1896, in the case of Plessy V. Ferguson, mandated separate but equal treatment for African Americans (Sykes 1). However, in 1954, the Supreme Court’s decision from Brown v.... [tags: Government Affirmative Action Essays]|
:: 30 Works Cited
| Essay on Affirmative Action - Affirmative action, is it still needed in this day and age. Has it accomplished what it was supposed to. Many people say that if America concentrated on programs that provided assistance to the most needy then they would have the opportunities that affirmative action is trying to provide. By going into the ghettos of our cities and stimulating business, thereby, promoting economic growth, the disenfranchised will reap the benefits. Have they been reaping the benefits of affirmation action. As a nation devoted to equality, the United States must do away with unproductive race-dividing policies.... [tags: Affirmative Action Essays]|
:: 3 Works Cited
| Essay on Affirmative Action - There are thousands of examples of situations where people of color, white women, and working class women and men of all races who were previously excluded from jobs or educational opportunities, or were denied opportunities once admitted, have gained access through affirmative action. When these policies received executive branch and judicial support, vast numbers of people of color, white women and men have gained access they would not otherwise have had. These gains have led to very real changes.... [tags: Affirmative Action Essays]|
:: 6 Works Cited
| Essay about Affirmative Action - In 1997, three students were denied admission into the University of Michigan. Each of them, in turn, sued the school, charging them with discrimination. In one of the cases, a student was denied admission into Michigan’s law school. Chicago Sun-Times writers Dave Newbart and Kate Grossman reported that last Monday, June 23, 2003, in a 5-4 majority ruling, swing vote Justice Sandra Day O’Connor judged for the school maintaining their right to consider the race of their applicants. In a second decision, the court ruled that they supported the University’s use of race in their admissions policy, but use of a point system was unconstitutional under the fourteenth amendment (Equal Protection Cl... [tags: Affirmative Action Essays]|
:: 1 Works Cited
| Affirmative Action Essay - After you graduate from college, you will be putting in your application for a job that you went to college for. Even though you might be the most qualified for the job you still might not obtain the position. Affirmative Action sometimes causes this because companies have to hire a certain number of minorities relative to the size of the company. This means that if there are no minority citizens available, immigrants who aren’t even US citizens can take the position. This is why Affirmative Action should be readjusted, because it is helping immigrants instead of the people it was meant for, American citizens.... [tags: Affirmative Action Essays]|
:: 1 Works Cited
| Affirmative Action Essay - The affirmative action program is important because it gives job opportunities for many people regardless of their race, color, religion, gender, and national origin. The work force should be well represented by the different ethnic backgrounds of our society. Some people look at affirmative action as reverse discrimination, but this program doesn’t guarantee employment based on race, ethnicity, or gender. The affirmative action program gives equal consideration to individuals from a different race, ethnicity, or gender, but not one of these factors may be the only factor used to determine an individual’s qualifications for any job.... [tags: Affirmative Action Essays]|
:: 2 Works Cited
| Affirmative Action Essay - Should a man be hired for his skills or for the color of his skin. Is racial diversity in the business world more important then the most qualified workers. Affirmative action has become an important topic in today’s society to better diversify the different races in America. Affirmative action is a set of public policies that were designed for the elimination of discrimination toward race, color, sex, etc. These policies are under attack today because of the unfairness toward the more qualified people.... [tags: Affirmative Action Essays]|
:: 2 Works Cited
| Affirmative Action Essay - What can be done about the majority of higher paying jobs going to the white males, and the issue of racial/sexual discrimination in both the workplace and in education. To this, the government already has its so-called solution… affirmative action. Affirmative action forces businesses and colleges to hire a certain number of minorities including women, so as to fill a government assessed quota. The solution is not to get even with the white males by disregarding either their hard work through high school to achieve the grade to get into their desired college or their superiority over a competitor for a job position just because the competitor happens to belong to a minority group.... [tags: Affirmative Action Essays]|
:: 1 Works Cited
Affirmative Action Executive Order Minority Students Lyndon Johnson Discriminated Against Significant Role Medical School Good Intentions Fourteenth Amendment Employment Discrimination
" However, the court ruled that the University of Michigan's undergraduate admissions program, which uses a point system that rates students and awards additional points to minorities, had to be modified. The undergraduate program, unlike the law school's, did not provide "individualized consideration" of applicants deemed necessary in previous Supreme Court decisions regarding affirmative action.
While the Supreme Court did put certain limitations on how much of a factor race can play within the admission process, it essentially upheld the legality of affirmative action. Today, the majority of both private and public universities use race as a consideration when selecting their students. The justifications given for implementing affirmative action programs vary widely.
One of the most common of these justifications is that affirmative action programs amend the negative effects of past discrimination by providing equal chances and opportunities to minorities. Numerous research studies have proven that education continues to be “the most powerful vehicle for achievement.” As one public policy researcher stated, “Increasingly the dividing line between those who are moving ahead and those who are moving behind is the educational link. Those who get it have a chance. And those who don’t get it don’t have a chance” (“Redeeming the American Promise,”1995).Supporters of affirmative action argue that these programs ensure that all people receive the same opportunity for higher education. For a variety of socioeconomic reasons, minorities are often at a disadvantage when they enter into the application process. Affirmative action programs seek to “level the playing field” for all Americans and expand equal opportunity admissions for students who historically have been excluded.
Advocates of affirmative action policies also maintain that these policies advance racial and ethnic diversity and improve the education of all students. In the last forty years, largely due to the implementation of affirmative action programs, minority representation on college campuses has dramatically increased. In one of the most thorough studies of student outcomes, psychologist Patricia Gurin found “strong evidence that diversity in higher education settings yields important benefits for all students, including minorities.” Gurin analyzed data collected from over 9,000 students nationwide from nearly 200 colleges and universities. For students who reported greater classroom diversity and interactions with students from different backgrounds, Gurin found: increased scores on a critical thinking test, greater intellectual self confidence and engagement, and a higher level of motivation to understand the perspectives of others. Jerry Kang, a professor at University of California at Las Angeles, defends affirmative action stating that it “allows for social interaction in an otherwise [racially] segregated world, which in turn allows us to break down our misconceptions and prejudices.” Kang as well as other advocates argue that there is substantial value in diversity and without affirmative action programs this diversity is less likely to occur.
Another justification is that affirmative action decreases racial stereotypes. Defenders of affirmative action policies argue that these policies dilute outdated stereotypes by helping minorities achieve non-stereotypical positions or status. Kang also writes that , “seeing minorities in such esteemed educational positions, jars all of us, regardless of race, out of old habits of thought and expectation.”
One of the more common criticisms of affirmative action policies, which was debated in the Bakke, Grtuz, and Grutter cases, is that the use of racial preferences in the admissions process is unconstitutional. Opponents maintain that affirmative action policies are in direct violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment which states, “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” The argument made is that affirmative action policies deny non-minorities equal treatment and are, therefore, unconstitutional.
Many opponents of affirmative action also feel that racial preferences in the admissions process are morally unjust and are essentially a solid example of reverse discrimination. Racial discrimination as defined in the Webster’s Dictionary is as follows: to make distinctions in treatment; to show partiality or prejudice due to one’s race. Affirmative action programs allow minorities with fewer qualifications than that of non-minorities gain entry into certain colleges and universities due to their race. Former Florida congressman, Charles Canady, described affirmative action as “dressed-up discrimination,” in a speech he delivered on the topic of racial equality. Canady declared that affirmative action programs, “deny opportunities to individuals solely because they are members of non preferred race, gender, or ethnic group.” He went on to state, “By locking deserving whites and Asians out of jobs and schools to make room for minorities with much weaker records, affirmative action exemplifies discrimination.” The basic argument is that affirmative action discriminates against the non- minority applicant.
Another argument against affirmative action is that it, in fact, harms minority students by putting them into schools that they are unprepared for. The effect of racial preferences at selective colleges guarantees that students are placed at least one level ahead of where they would have been competitive. Thomas Sowell, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution in Stanford, “Minority students, who were perfectly capable of excelling in good colleges, have been artificially turned into failures by being admitted into high pressure where only the most exemplary students can succeed.”
A final criticism is that racial preferences in college admissions lowers the academic quality of the college. By admitting students with fewer qualifications because they are minorities, the college or university is turning down more qualified students. It is only logical then to assume that this would lower the quality of the school.
The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that Michigan’s ban on affirmative action at public universities was constitutional. Other states have similar bans, and more may follow suit.
Do you support affirmative action in college admissions? Should public universities be allowed to use race and ethnicity as factors in deciding who is admitted?
In “Court Backs Michigan on Affirmative Action,” Adam Liptak writes:
In a fractured decision that revealed deep divisions over what role the judiciary should play in protecting racial and ethnic minorities, the Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a Michigan constitutional amendment that bans affirmative action in admissions to the state’s public universities.
The 6-to-2 ruling effectively endorsed similar measures in seven other states. It may also encourage more states to enact measures banning the use of race in admissions or to consider race-neutral alternatives to ensure diversity.
States that forbid affirmative action in higher education, like Florida and California, as well as Michigan, have seen a significant drop in the enrollment of black and Hispanic students in their most selective colleges and universities.
Last time we asked a similar question, in 2011, Faith made the following argument in favor of affirmative action:
Seeing students at my own high school is a reason to support affirmative action. Granted, there are times when it doesn’t always work, but it helps more than it harms. Many of my friends are trying to get ahead, but it is not their fault that their parents can’t review their essays, it’s not their fault they can’t afford review books, it’s not their fault they can’t do every extracurricular because they are busy taking care of siblings or bringing home a paycheck for bills, it’s not their fault that they have every odd against them. I know too many people that need affirmative action to help them get into a good college, because quite frankly, I have never met smarter people. Their grades and scores may not be what mine are, but I guarantee they are smarter, and work harder than I do, and I work hard. So, even though I have a 2200, a 3.7 GPA, and a #5 ranking of 519 students with extraordinary credentials, I wouldn’t think twice if my friends were admitted before me because they deserve it more.
In contrast, Ashley K. recently wrote in opposition of affirmative action for our recent editorial contest:
At what point can racial discrimination end? When can all people be simply viewed as equal individuals where race and ethnicity are no longer acknowledged?
On college campuses, I agree that diversity is an important aspect of growing more socially and culturally aware. However, I believe that basing the acceptance of applicants on their race rather than their academic achievements weakens the idea of gaining a higher education and is truly unfair to applicants of all racial and ethnic groups. The point of attending a university is to gain wisdom and knowledge, not to spend time with the most diverse group of people that can be gathered together.
I, as a Pacific Islander, have always benefited from the implementation of affirmative action, and yet I am appalled by the idea of being given an advantage in college admissions based strictly on the ethnicity with which I identify. I am constantly frustrated that I may only have been accepted to certain institutions based on nothing more than the fact that I will help fulfill their diversity proportion. I may never know if my academics alone, without my ethnicity, would have been sufficient for me to attend a prestigious university. Instead, I feel as if all of my achievements are demeaned because of my identification with a non-white ethnicity and judged by others who may believe that I was only accepted to certain universities because of my ethnicity and not my academic standings.
Students: Read the entire article, then tell us …
— Do you support affirmative action? How important is diversity on college campuses? Does society have an obligation to try to right past injustices?
— Or is affirmative action unfair? Do you agree with Ashley K.’s argument above that affirmative action does a disservice to minority students by putting a question mark on their achievements?
— Public universities in Michigan can still give preference to athletes, children of alumni or students from underrepresented parts of the state. In this context, does it make sense that admissions officers are not allowed to look at race and ethnicity?
— Is affirmative action the most effective way to promote a diverse student body? Would alternative policies, such as admitting the top students from each high school in the state or taking family income into account, be equally or more effective?
Questions about issues in the news for students 13 and older.