Standardized Testing Debate Essay Structure

The Standardized Testing Debate Essay

Standardized testing is one of the most hotly debated topics in education. Experts in education have different views on the topic. Standardized testing refers to a testing method whereby students are subjected to the same assessment procedures set by examiners that intend to examine and score them as part of a wider student’s body. Standardized tests are of two kinds, the aptitude tests and the achievement tests. The aptitude test examines the students’ advanced skills or competency. Achievement tests evaluate students’ understanding in a formal educational institution and reviews their performance and understanding of key concepts. While evaluating the pros and cons of standard testing, it is evident that researchers and educators question whether it measures how effective the school taught the concepts to the student or whether it asses the students’ comprehension of the basic concepts taught. The articles under review define and explain the pros and cons but fail to offer an alternative method of assessing students.

Standardized testing brings a sense of accountability to both the teachers and the students. According to Derrick Meador, an industry expert, teachers have to deliver effectively in preparing students for the standardized testing. He also states that there is also the advantage of the results of the students going public. This puts pressure on the school as a whole because the results will be a reflection of how much effort they put in their schoolwork. This publicity also ensures that a teachers performance is evaluated and poses the risk of a teacher losing their job or the school being closed and given to the state (Meador, n.d.).

Standardized testing makes it possible to create a clear qualitative comparison of how students in different schools, districts and states perform. This enhances a healthy competitive spirit for the students. The comparison is significant as it can also provide a benchmarking platform, where different schools in different districts or states can consult for their academic progress. Standardized testing gives an accurate comparison between performances of schools in different states, as opposed to what a non-standardized test would give.

Standardized testing also provides a set of well thought of structures that act as a guideline for what teachers should teach at a particular time to students of a particular level. Not only does this avoid repetition of content but it also ensures that in the event a student transfers to another school they will be at par with their peers of the same level. These structures ensure the students are only given what they can handle at any particular time in line with their ability. The structures also provide a sense of continuity and organization process in the learning process. Standardized testing gives students an easy time in following up their schoolwork.

The data that comes from standardized tests also makes it easy to compare data from different...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Standardized Testing: The SAT and the ACT

1322 words - 5 pages Standardized testing has played an important role in the college admission decisions. The role of admission exams is always changing and evolving with time. The most prominent exams used are the SAT and the ACT. Their purpose is for gauging student knowledge for placement and possible success rate. Each test is comprised of numerous educational factors to gauge knowledge. The SAT and the ACT derived from other test forms to become what...

The Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing

2228 words - 9 pages “It’s awful. I just cringe every time I walk in the teacher’s room because these tests are the only topic of conservation in there, and it raises your anxiety just to hear how scared everybody is. A few years ago, I really loved teaching, but this is intense… I’m not sure how long I can take it “(Barksdale-Ladd, Thomas 390). Two major classifications of standardized testing are norm-referenced and criterion-referenced testing. These two...

Standardized Testing Hinders The Learning Process

1196 words - 5 pages Teachers spend time on the memorization of specific words that will be on the state test, not vocabulary building exercises. Educators have pep rallies that take educational time away from lesson plans and teaching in order to have the students learn cheers expressing how well they are going to do on the state test. Excess teacher and administration time is spent figuring out game plans, not for teaching students, but rather for figuring out how...

The Debate Over Animal Testing

1811 words - 7 pages Currently there are millions of animals being used for testing for such items like make-up and hair products. When thinking about what these mice, rabbits, cats, dogs and multiple other animals have to endure for such testing it comes to mind that there has to be another way; however, there are other important testing these animals are being used for. Just like testing for cosmetics these animals are also being use for medical testing in trying...

The Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing in the US

1508 words - 6 pages Most students, by the time they reach college, have taken numerous MCA tests (Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments), NWEA tests (Northwest Evaluation Association), and either an ACT test (American College Testing) or SAT test (Scholastic Assessment Test), depending on which region of the United States they are from. Webster’s defines a standardized test as “any test in which the same test is given in the same manner to all test takers.” Every...

The effects on standardized testing on both the teachers and students.

1250 words - 5 pages Teachers are faced with more and more challenges as time progresses. The job of the teacher used to just be to impart knowledge to your students, but now the teacher must be a moral guide for their pupils as well. In addition to all the normal problems a teacher runs in to in a coarse of their year they now are faced with more and more state mandated standardized tests. These test have become the indicators for whether a teacher is a suitable...

High-Stakes Testing, the Standardized Classroom, and the Marginalization of Multicultural Education

1864 words - 7 pages “The world’s greatest problems do not result from people being unable to read and write. They result from people in the world-from different cultures, races, religions, and nations-being unable to get along and to work together to solve the world’s problems.” These statements by James A. Banks have made a profound impact on my view towards multicultural education and the nation’s current trend of standardization and high-stakes testing. ...

Is standardized testing a good idea? The lack of equality in today's school systems often decide a student's future. Is a standardized test the measure of a student?

1219 words - 5 pages Standardized Testing: Good or Bad?The current trend of "high stakes" standardized testing can be both a blessing and acurse to today's school systems and students. The repercussions felt by the outcomes ofthese tests often determine the financial well being of school districts, the careers ofeducators and the academic future of...

Pitfalls of Standardized Testing. This essay explains how standardized tests should not be the only way that schools should look at how students improve in their acedemics.

616 words - 2 pages AUnder pressure to raise test scores, some school systems have trimmed or even eliminated recess, field trips, electives, science, social studies, and subjects that are not on the test.@ This quote makes it clear that standardized tests are becoming the key factors in determining the academic status of students. These tests have no effect on the student=s grades and in no way compel them to study or even try to receive a passing grade....

Standardized Tests Do Not Measure Student Achievement

1767 words - 7 pages Standardized testing has been around since the mid 1800’s. Even though testing has been around for a long time it is still debated whether or not it should precisely “score” students. Students have been subjected to standardized tests frequently through their years in school due to laws which have been passed by Congress. Decisions about the evaluation of schools and students are recurrently made by government authority and are often...

Arguing Against Standardized Testing

2874 words - 11 pages To many students standardized testing has become another part of schooling that is dreaded. Standardized testing has been a part of school since the nineteen-thirties; in those days it was used as a way to measure students that had special needs. Since the time that standardized test have been in American schools there has been many programs that have placed an importance on the idea of standardized testing such as the No Child Left Behind Act of...

A standardized test is any form of test that (1) requires all test takers to answer the same questions, or a selection of questions from common bank of questions, in the same way, and that (2) is scored in a “standard” or consistent manner, which makes it possible to compare the relative performance of individual students or groups of students. While different types of tests and assessments may be “standardized” in this way, the term is primarily associated with large-scale tests administered to large populations of students, such as a multiple-choice test given to all the eighth-grade public-school students in a particular state, for example.

In addition to the familiar multiple-choice format, standardized tests can include true-false questions, short-answer questions, essay questions, or a mix of question types. While standardized tests were traditionally presented on paper and completed using pencils, and many still are, they are increasingly being administered on computers connected to online programs (for a related discussion, see computer-adaptive test). While standardized tests may come in a variety of forms, multiple-choice and true-false formats are widely used for large-scale testing situations because computers can score them quickly, consistently, and inexpensively. In contrast, open-ended essay questions need to be scored by humans using a common set of guidelines or rubrics to promote consistent evaluations from essay to essay—a less efficient and more time-intensive and costly option that is also considered to be more subjective. (Computerized systems designed to replace human scoring are currently being developed by a variety of companies; while these systems are still in their infancy, they are nevertheless becoming the object of growing national debate.)

While standardized tests are a major source of debate in the United States, many test experts and educators consider them to be a fair and objective method of assessing the academic achievement of students, mainly because the standardized format, coupled with computerized scoring, reduces the potential for favoritism, bias, or subjective evaluations. On the other hand, subjective human judgment enters into the testing process at various stages—e.g., in the selection and presentation of questions, or in the subject matter and phrasing of both questions and answers. Subjectivity also enters into the process when test developers set passing scores—a decision that can affect how many students pass or fail, or how many achieve a level of performance considered to be “proficient.” For more detailed discussions of these issue, see measurement error, test accommodations, test bias and score inflation.

Standardized tests may be used for a wide variety of educational purposes. For example, they may be used to determine a young child’s readiness for kindergarten, identify students who need special-education services or specialized academic support, place students in different academic programs or course levels, or award diplomas and other educational certificates. The following are a few representative examples of the most common forms of standardized test:

  • Achievement tests are designed to measure the knowledge and skills students learned in school or to determine the academic progress they have made over a period of time. The tests may also be used to evaluate the effectiveness of a schools and teachers, or identify the appropriate academic placement for a student—i.e., what courses or programs may be deemed most suitable, or what forms of academic support they may need. Achievement tests are “backward-looking” in that they measure how well students have learned what they were expected to learn.
  • Aptitude tests attempt to predict a student’s ability to succeed in an intellectual or physical endeavor by, for example, evaluating mathematical ability, language proficiency, abstract reasoning, motor coordination, or musical talent. Aptitude tests are “forward-looking” in that they typically attempt to forecast or predict how well students will do in a future educational or career setting. Aptitude tests are often a source of debate, since many question their predictive accuracy and value.
  • College-admissions tests are used in the process of deciding which students will be admitted to a collegiate program. While there is a great deal of debate about the accuracy and utility of college-admissions tests, and many institutions of higher education no longer require applicants to take them, the tests are used as indicators of intellectual and academic potential, and some may consider them predictive of how well an applicant will do in postsecondary program.
  • International-comparison tests are administered periodically to representative samples of students in a number of countries, including the United States, for the purposes of monitoring achievement trends in individual countries and comparing educational performance across countries. A few widely used examples of international-comparison tests include the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), and the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS).
  • Psychological tests, including IQ tests, are used to measure a person’s cognitive abilities and mental, emotional, developmental, and social characteristics. Trained professionals, such as school psychologists, typically administer the tests, which may require students to perform a series of tasks or solve a set of problems. Psychological tests are often used to identify students with learning disabilities or other special needs that would qualify them for specialized services.


Following a wide variety of state and federal laws, policies, and regulations aimed at improving school and teacher performance, standardized achievement tests have become an increasingly prominent part of public schooling in the United States. When focused on reforming schools and improving student achievement, standardized tests are used in a few primary ways:

  • To hold schools and educators accountable for educational results and student performance. In this case, test scores are used as a measure of effectiveness, and low scores may trigger a variety of consequences for schools and teachers. For a more detailed discussion see high-stakes test.
  • To evaluate whether students have learned what they are expected to learn, such as whether they have met state learning standards. In this case, test scores are seen as a representative indicator of student achievement.
  • To identify gaps in student learning and academic progress. In this case, test scores may be used, along with other information about students, to diagnose learning needs so that educators can provide appropriate services, instruction, or academic support.
  • To identify achievement gaps among different student groups, including students of color, students who are not proficient in English, students from low-income households, and students with physical or learning disabilities. In this case, exposing and highlighting achievement gaps may be seen as an essential first step in the effort to educate all students well, which can lead to greater public awareness and changes in educational policies and programs.
  • To determine whether educational policies are working as intended. In this case, elected officials and education policy makers may rely on standardized-test results to determine whether their laws and policies are working or not, or to compare educational performance from school to school or state to state. They may also use the results to persuade the public and other elected officials that their policies are in the best interest of children and society.


While debates about standardized testing are wide-ranging, nuanced, and sometimes emotionally charged, many debates tend to be focused on the ways in which the tests are used, and whether they present reliable or unreliable evaluations of student learning, rather than on whether standardized testing is inherently good or bad (although there is certainly debate on this topic as well). Most test developers and testing experts, for example, caution against using standardized-test scores as an exclusive measure of educational performance, although many would also contend that test scores can be a valuable indicator of performance if used appropriately and judiciously. Generally speaking, standardized testing is more likely to become an object of debate and controversy when test scores are used to make consequential decisions about educational policies, schools, teachers, and students. The tests are less likely to be contentious when they are used to diagnose learning needs and provide students with better services—although the line separating these two purposes is notoriously fuzzy in practice (thus, the ongoing debates).

While an exhaustive discussion of standardized-testing debates is beyond the scope of this resource, the following questions will illustrate a few of the major issues commonly discussed and debated in the United States:

  • Are numerical scores on a standardized test misleading indicators of student learning, since standardized tests can only evaluate a narrow range of achievement using inherently limited methods? Or do the scores provide accurate, objective, and useful evidence of school, teacher, or student performance? (Standardized tests don’t measure everything students are expected to learn in school. A test with 50 multiple-choice questions, for example, can’t possibly measure all the knowledge and skills a student was taught, or is expected to learn, in a particular subject area, which is one reason why some educators and experts caution against using standardized-test scores as the only indicator of educational performance and success.)
  • Are standardized tests fair to all students because every student takes the same test and is evaluated in the same way? Do the tests have inherent biases that may disadvantage certain groups, such as students of color, students who are unfamiliar with American cultural conventions, students who are not proficient in English, or students with disabilities that may affect their performance?
  • Is the use of standardized tests providing valuable information that educators and school leaders can use to improve instructional quality? Is the pervasive overuse of testing actually taking up valuable instructional time that could be better spent teaching students more content and skills?
  • Do the benefits of standardized testing—consistent data on school and student performance that can be used to inform efforts to improve schools and teaching—outweigh the costs—the money spent on developing the tests and analyzing the results, the instructional time teachers spend prepping students, or the time students spend taking the test?
  • Do math and reading test scores, for example, provide a full and accurate picture of school, teacher, and student performance? Do standardized tests focus too narrowly on a few academic subjects?
  • Does the narrow range of academic content evaluated by standardized tests cause teachers to focus too much on test preparation and a few academic subjects (a practice known as “teaching to the test”) at the expense of other worthwhile educational pursuits, such as art, music, health, physical education, or 21st century skills, for example?
  • Do standardized tests, and the consequences attached to low scores, hold schools, educators, and students to higher standards and improve the quality of public education? Do the tests create conditions that undermine effective education, such as cheating, unhealthy forms of competition, or unjustly negative perceptions of public schooling?
  • Should some of the most important decisions in public education—such as whether to reduce or increase school funding or fire teachers and principals—be made entirely or primarily on the basis of test scores? Are standardized-test scores, which could potentially be misleading or inaccurate, too limited a measure to use as a basis for such consequential decisions?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *